questions re rover 1994 416 automatic

Having problems with your club car? This is the place for asking advice and help on technical problems. Resident experts will be on hand to help you keep your car in tip top condition
Post Reply
Caroline
Forum User
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Edinburgh

questions re rover 1994 416 automatic

Post by Caroline »

Hi there! I wonder if you can help... I am considering the purchase of a 1994 416 automatic, sedan rover, with 98,000 miles on the clock, one owner. Can anyone tell me how reliable this car is generally? Also, I couldn't find crash test results on the encap site or anywhere else - does anyone know what the safety rating of this car is? Also, is petrol consumption stated on the information page of this site of 27 mpg urban correct? (it seems like a lot)

Thank you so much!

Caroline
User avatar
matthewsemple
Forum User
Posts: 620
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:41 pm

Post by matthewsemple »

The Rover 416 Auto has a Honda engine and this is generally a very strong and reliable unit. The mileage should not put you off as they can cover much higher mileage than that.

The Euro NCAP tests were not brought in until the late 1990s so this model would not have been tested as it was launched in 1989. A 1994 car will probably be fitted with a driver's airbag and all these models had side impact bars.

The fuel consumption figure of 27mpg is about right. You have to remember that if you are driving an automatic car in traffic, it is not going to be that economical. The Honda engine is not as economical as the Rover K-Series which produces almost as much power in 1.4 16v version.

Do you need an automatic - if not I would recommend something like a 214Si or 414Si if you want an economical Rover.
Caroline
Forum User
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Post by Caroline »

Thanks for your prompt and comprehensive reply.

Caroline
User avatar
matthewsemple
Forum User
Posts: 620
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:41 pm

Post by matthewsemple »

Not a problem! And welcome to the forums, Caroline!
User avatar
Smithy
Club President
Posts: 2855
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:14 pm

Post by Smithy »

Yes welcome to the forums :)
Rover 220 GTi Turbo.
The R8 Man

Post by The R8 Man »

If your Honda engine is serviced as per Rovers guidelines, your engine should last double its milage at least.
Just try not to rely on the kickdown all the time since that will damage the head gasket after a short time.
T1M
Forum User
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:45 pm

Post by T1M »

We've got a honda engined 416 auto and its on 187k now with no big problems other than new suspension bushes, CV joints and a water pump, and rusty rear sills.

All of this started happening after 130k though so if its been serviced the car you're looking at should prove excellent.

The honda 1.6 is a strong engine, no head gasket scares and they're not too bad economy wise. Auto box always seems responsive too.

If its 1994 it should have an airbag in the steering wheel and side impact bars, but as said it wont be NCAP tested, its too old!

CV joints seem to go easily on R8s so check it doesnt make any knocking sounds when you steer sharply. Also check the rear sills and arches for any rust or bubbling..

Welcome btw :D
Third Person Plural
Forum User
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:09 am

Post by Third Person Plural »

T1M wrote:
The honda 1.6 is a strong engine, no head gasket scares and they're not too bad economy wise. Auto box always seems responsive too.

If its 1994 it should have an airbag in the steering wheel and side impact bars, but as said it wont be NCAP tested, its too old!

CV joints seem to go easily on R8s so check it doesnt make any knocking sounds when you steer sharply. Also check the rear sills and arches for any rust or bubbling..
The Honda D16 is just as prone to head gasket failure as any K-series, it doesn't have a very large coolant capacity and if the cooling system is neglected the headgasket can pop pretty readily. Economy and performance are pretty poor compared to the T/M/K-series equivalents too, unless it's a DOHC.

R8s are pretty tough compared to their competitors, there's a definite "solidness" to the design. I wouldn't look forward to crashing one but survival rates in these are probably high.

CV joints are basically service items on older cars, but obviously budget for (£90 a side) it if you hear them clicking.
Post Reply